According to the British media, they are waiting for the other to twitch too, only to jump together. Johnson has already ventured a little in his latest article for the Telegraph.
The clear cut with the EU, without compromises, without ifs or buts. But since Monday at the latest, when the British House of Commons pushed through to vote on various Brexit options, the Brexit Ultras of the conservative Tories have had to realize: They could have miscalculated, Brexit could slip away from them. And now a bitter dispute breaks out: Should you support the hated Brexit agreement of Prime Minister Theresa May in order to prevent a softer Brexit?
Jacob Rees-Mogg was one of the first to give in on Tuesday. Ironically, the Brexit leader of the Tory group with his cutting criticism of May’s deal and the EU, which is making Great Britain a “” slave state “”, has now rowed back. “” May’s deal is better than not leaving the EU at all, “” he said in his so-called Moggcast. Now there is a risk that everything will be put on the back burner or that Great Britain will no longer leave the EU at all. “” We are in a very difficult political situation, “” he said with British understatement. Rees-Mogg was also self-critical. The thought process that people like him might not have considered before is that Brexit is “” more of a process than an event.
Many would have believed they were leaving the EU on March 29th, “” bingo, out “”. But that is not the case.
At the same time, Rees-Mogg, who had thrown a champagne party for May’s deal after the first disastrous defeat, emphasized another insight: “” We have recognized that what we want and what we can achieve because of our low levels The number is not necessarily the same. “” The Eurosceptic Conservatives could not win a vote in parliament on their own. In the “” Daily Mail “” he also apologized for having changed his mind. On Twitter he wrote: “Half a loaf is better than none.” “Other Brexiteers who had previously refused to accept May’s deal have also recognized the need for a compromise.
This is the “” least bad option “”, tweeted the Conservative MP Michael Fabricant, who had twice voted against the Prime Minister’s agreement. Hardcore Brexiteer Peter Bone also didn’t rule out joining Rees-Mogg. He will “” cross the bridge when we get there, “” he said. Most eyes are now on the former ministers Boris Johnson and Dominic Raab, who both resigned because of May’s European course and who they now apparently want to inherit.
The rivals are still hesitating to take over the party chairmanship as they do not want to alienate their loyal supporters among the Brexiteers. According to the British media, they are waiting for the other to twitch too, only to jump together. Johnson has already ventured a little in his latest article for the Telegraph.professional biology essay service In the usual manner, he criticized the “Punic conditions” on which the EU insists. At the same time, however, he admitted the Brexiteers’ dilemma, which the Prime Minister had apparently counted on: “” We have the scylla of the backstop on the one hand and the charybdis of the infinite parliamentary delay on the other “”. If they now vote against May’s “” deplorable agreement “” there is a “” risk that should not be underestimated that we will not leave the EU at all. “” Criticism was not long in coming. “” This could be Boris’ Judas moment, “it said sardonically on Twitter.
That moment could be made easier for Johnson by May’s meeting with Tories that evening – supposedly to announce the date of her resignation. However, it should be a horse-trading: resign only against approval of their deal. If the Brexiteers are already sacrificing pure teaching, then at least the hapless May should still be carried away. At a meeting at their country estate Checkers over the weekend, their employees apparently sounded out the chances of such an exchange, but that was before parliament took control of the Brexit votes on Monday. Meanwhile, the mood among the conservatives, who actually wanted to celebrate leaving the EU this week, is anything but good.
In his Whatsapp group it is “” like rats in a sack, “” quotes the “Guardian” “of a morose Tory MP who was in favor of Brexit. “Everyone turns against the other.” “The newspaper assumes that even if a number of Brexiteers should vote for May’s deal, 30 Brexit ultras will still not give in. They reject the agreement on ideological grounds, as well as any other softer form of Brexit that could now emerge in the lower house. They particularly criticize the backstop, which aims to avoid a border on the Irish island and provides for the UK to remain in the customs union if there is no free trade agreement with the EU in the next few years, so that the miracle of Westminster will come about and May her deal can whip through is therefore anything but self-evident. Especially since May is dependent on the Northern Irish DUP, which supports her government and which also rigorously rejects the backstop.
The parliamentary commissioner of the government, Andrea Leadsom, said today that they will continue to speak with the party: “” We are working hard to get support for May’s agreement. “” In her opinion, parliament could then over again on Thursday or Friday vote on the treaty. But even then, May is still dependent on members of the opposition. And she stupidly alienated them last week when she blamed the MPs for the chaos in the kingdom in an angry speech. They had “” navel gazing “” long enough, the people now have a right to Brexit. Only: Without the parliamentarians, May will not be able to enforce her Brexit. Source: ntv.de “It is one of the most important votes in the House of Commons. Nevertheless, the chairman of the House of Commons, Brexiteer Rees-Mogg, lounges almost in its entire length Tory Bank.
The opposition wonders: has he lost the ability to sit? Or is it just bad behavior? Jacob Rees-Mogg is an old school Brit. Eton, Oxford, all the trimmings. His suits are made to measure, his shoes are polished.
He boasted that he never changed his many children. As the new chairman of the lower house, the staunch Brexiteer recently even issued a language rule that forbids certain words. But as pedantic as he otherwise likes to be, at one of the most important debates in the House of Commons this year he disregarded all conventions: Spread over several seats, he lounged apparently dozing on the green Tory bench.
In doing so, he probably achieved exactly what he wanted: His behavior aroused violent outrage among the opposition. The Green MP, Caroline Lucas, fumed: “” There was a lot of discussion tonight about democracy and the chairman of the House of Commons – I have to say that – expressed such contempt for this house and its people with his body language. “” You added that Rees-Mogg “” sprawled over three seats, lying there like he was listening to something boring. “” Labor MP Anna Turley was upset about “” the embodiment of arrogance, sophistication, disrespect and disdain our parliament “”. Her party friend Angela Rayner tweeted viciously that she would not be surprised if his nanny came over with a blanket, pillow and a hot drink. And Liberal Democrat Sarah Wollaston asked whether Rees-Mogg had lost his ability to sit down properly, whether his hanging around the bench was pretentious or simply bad behavior, but Rees-Mogg did not contest indignant calls from parliamentarians to sit down properly at.
Only when the results of the vote were announced, in which the House of Commons voted down the government course with unusual unity and passed a vote on a no deal, did he sit upright again. Which led the former Tory MP Anna Soubry to comment: “” Mr Speaker, the result of tonight even made the chairman of the House of Commons sit down straight. “” After all, Rees-Mogg inspired a number of Twitter users to parody. One of them saw the falling British pound embodied in Rees-Mogg’s premises: for another, the Tory politician’s attitude symbolized the lost majority of the government: even as Ophelia, Hamlet’s lover, he had to serve.
As is well known, their life did not end well. Source: ntv.de, ghö “A tough struggle: May has so far not had a majority in the lower house for her deal. (Photo: imago images / Xinhua) Tory boss Theresa May has long got used to bitter defeats. But that the British lower house now speaking for trial votes on Brexit is another blow for the Prime Minister.
What does this mean for the exit from the EU and the British government? And what happens next this week, in which Great Britain actually wanted to leave the EU? What happened? With a clear majority of 329 to 302 votes, Parliament voted on Monday to hold trial votes on various Brexit scenarios. Then everything could come on the table: remaining in the EU internal market, remaining in the customs union, a free trade agreement with the EU, a new referendum and even the annulment of Brexit. “” There shouldn’t be anything we can’t talk about, “says Tory rebel Dominic Grieve. “” We have to find an alternative. “” What does that mean?
It is still unclear whether the notoriously divided House of Commons can agree on any option. Former State Secretary Richard Harrington assumes that there is no overwhelming majority for any Brexit alternative. In addition, the outcome of the votes is not binding on the government. Nevertheless, the vote of the House of Commons means a setback for May. Keir Starmer of the Labor Party called it “another humiliating defeat for the Prime Minister, who is completely in control of her.” Party, its cabinet and the Brexit process has “” lost. In fact, power is slipping away from the government more and more, with parliament now helping to determine the timetable.
The Brexit Ministry criticized the result as a dangerous precedent that upset the “” balance between our democratic institutions “”. Eurosceptic Tory Bill Cash expressed himself even more clearly: ““ This is a constitutional revolution and the House will regret it. ”“ What happens next? Parliament will hold the test votes on the Brexit scenarios on Wednesday. May already made it clear that she did not feel bound by the result. The government could not implement a plan that contradicts the Tory election manifesto of 2017. This would still rule out a customs union or membership in the internal market.
However, Tory rebels have already indicated that they could resort to more extensive means. “We trust that the government will take Parliament’s wishes into account,” “Tory MP Nick Boles told the BBC. However, if the government refuses to listen to the decisions of parliament, they will be brought about by a law. Ministers like Liam Fox and Stev Barclay, on the other hand, now see an ever greater likelihood of new elections taking place in order to find a way out of the Brexit stalemate. May himself stated that Britain could be heading for a lengthy “” slow Brexit “” . If the EU were to agree to an extension of Article 50, it could take several months and result in the country still having to vote in the European elections at the end of May. Tory MP Gary Streeter, who blamed the Brexit Ultras in his party, made a similar statement: “” We now have a postponement of at least twelve months ahead of us, European elections and a very soft Brexit or no Brexit at all “”, quotes him in the “” Times “”. And that is what you, who really want Brexit, got us into.
No, that doesn’t make sense. No point at all. “” At its summit in Brussels, the EU agreed, at the request of London, to postpone the exit date, which was scheduled for this Friday. Should the House of Commons approve May’s Brexit agreement, the country will leave the EU on May 22nd. If this does not succeed, Great Britain can until the 12th
April make new proposals – or there will be an exit from the EU without a contract, the so-called no deal or chaos Brexit. Will May’s Brexit deal come? The House of Commons has already failed the Prime Minister’s deal twice with a large majority. Last week, Speaker of Parliament John Bercow unearthed a 415-year-old ordinance, according to which one and the same bill may not be submitted to the vote as often as desired in a session. Still, May fought for her deal over the weekend and met with Brexit advocates.
On Monday she finally rowed back. The Northern Irish DUP, on whose votes the Tory government depends, once again made it clear that it would reject the agreement. However, the agreement is not yet off the table. May said in parliament on Monday afternoon: “” As things stand, there is still insufficient support in the lower house to submit the agreement for a third vote. “” Which, conversely, can also mean: May still has the hope of another vote not given up if all other alternatives were to fail. Brexit hardliner Jacob Rees-Mogg, of all people, gave in. “” Is a deal worse than not leaving the EU at all? No, definitely not.
If we accept this deal, we are legally out of the EU “”, quoted British journalists. This is of the utmost importance and restores British independence. Conservative MP Michael Fabricant agreed with Rees-Mogg’s assessment. May’s deal is the “” least bad option “”, he wrote on Twitter How long will May last? If proof was needed, Monday in the House of Commons showed once more: May has completely slipped control of her party.
The request for the trial votes came from Conservative MP Oliver Letwin, who is hoping for a bipartisan solution in the case of Brexit. In addition, around 30 Tory MPs voted for him – together with the opposition. Among the proponents of the motion were several state secretaries who resigned from their offices.